Page 185 - Let them speak Towards a patient reported outcome measure set for

Evaluating the core PROM set
Table 4. Reliability and efficiency of the PROMIS CATs and SFs and legacy questionnaires for adults.
PROMIS CAT Reliability Number of items Floor
(%)
Ceiling
(%)
Number of
participants
Mean SE PROMIS Physical Function 2.0 5.2 4 12 0 0 37
PROMIS Social Roles and
2.0 5.3 4 9 0 0 37
Activities
PROMIS Depression 2.2 8.0 5 12 0 0 37
PROMIS Anxiety 2.2 6.4 4 9 0 0 37
PROMIS Fatigue 2.1 5.0 4 9 0 0 36
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 2.2 9.8 7 12 0 0 36
Mean SE Number of items PROMIS SF Mean Min Max
Floor
(%)
Ceiling
(%)
Number of
participants
PROMIS Anger 3.3 5 0 0 36
2.6 8 0 5.6 36
PROMIS Cognitive
Functioning – Abilities
Legacy subscale Reliability
Number of items Floor
Ceiling
Number of
(α)
(%)
(%)
participants1
SF-36 Physical functioning 0.87 10 0 11.8 17
SF-36 Role limitations due to
0.92 4 0 0 17
physical health problems
SF-36 Role limitations due to
0.81 3 0 0 17
emotional problems
SF-36 Energy/fatigue 0.68 4 0 0 17
SF-36 Emotional well-being 0.82 5 0 0 17
SF-36 Social functioning 0.74 2 5.9 5.9 17
SF-36 Bodily pain 0.91 2 5.9 11.8 17
SF-36 General health 0.85 5 0 0 17
ASR Anxious/depressed 0.86 18 0 0 15
ASR Withdrawn 0.79 9 6.7 0 15
ASR Attention problems 0.74 15 0 0 15
ASR Aggressive behaviour 0.87 15 6.7 0 15
PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; CAT, Computerized
Adaptive Testing; SF, Short Form; SF-36, Short Form-36 Health Survey; ARS, Adult Self Report.
1After completing the core PROM set, participants could opt to complete additional legacy
questionnaires. Consequently, sample sizes for the legacy questionnaires were lower than for the
PROMIS CATs and SFs.
7
183