Page 105 - Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Pathogenetic and Clinical aspects

Table 1.
Summary of the results of the questionnaire distributed to members of the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) and Werkgroep Kinder Orthopaedie (WKO) with a comparison with the POSNA study [6]
Number of respondents (% of society members)
Median (range) of years in practice Paid workload (n = 135)*
75–100
50–75
25–50
0–25
Classification (n = 133)* Acute/chronic Unstable/stable
Both
Evaluation (n = 135)
Plain radiographs: two views Dynamic screening Magnetic resonance imaging Computed tomography Bone scan
Other
Combination
Treatment timing (n = 134) <6 h
< 24 h
< 48 h
> 48 h
Patient positioning (n = 134)* Traction table
Free on radiolucent table Other
Treatment method (n = 136) Open fixation
Percutaneous fixation Variable
Reposition of head (n = 131) Yes
No
Both
Treatment fixation (n = 136) Single screw
Two screws
99 (65) 12.6 (1–35)
29% 37% 28% 6%
8% 17% 75%
100% 8% 15% 10% 7% 3% 34%
18% 72% 9% 1%
78% 19% 3%
11% 89% 12%
29% 69% 2%
84% 12%
43 (65) 13.9 (1–30)
51% 5% 18% 26%
35% 14% 51%
100% 3% 13% 8% 5% 0% 25%
23% 62% 13% 2%
46% 54%
18% 87% 5%
41% 59% 0%
69% 31%
142 (65) 263 (33) 12.9 (1–35) 15 (1–42)
36% 27% 25% 12%
16% 27% 16% 73% 68% 0%
100% 97% 7%
14% 1% 10%
7% 2% 2%
30%
19% 31% 69% 57% 10%
2% 12%
69% 66% 29% 33% 2% 2%
13% 3% 88% 96% 9%
32% 12% 66%
2%
79% 57% 18% 40%
6
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
BSCOS
WKO
POSNA
United Kingdom (n = 149)
Netherlands (n = 71)
Total
(n = 220)
n = 794
103