Page 53 - Let them speak Towards a patient reported outcome measure set for

Outcomes and instruments
44. Griffiths AW, Smith SJ, Martin A, et al. Exploring self-report and proxy-report quality-of-life
measures for people living with dementia in care homes. Qual Life Res 2020; 29: 463–472.
45. Alcantara J, Ohm J and Alcantara J. Comparison of pediatric self reports and parent proxy
reports utilizing PROMIS: results from a chiropractic practice-based research network.
Complement Ther Clin Pract 2017; 29: 48–52.
46. Janse AJ, Gemke RJBJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, et al. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t
always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 653–661.
47. Lunsky Y and Bramston P. A preliminary study of perceived stress in adults with intellectual
disabilities according to self-report and informant ratings. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2006; 31:
20–27.
48. Morrow AM, Hayen A, Quine S, et al. A comparison of doctors’, parents’ and children’s reports
of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic conditions. Child Care
Health Dev 2012; 38: 186–195.
49. Janssen CGC, Schuengel C and Stolk J. Perspectives on quality of life of people with intellectual
disabilities: the interpretation of discrepancies between clients and caregivers. Qual Life Res
2005; 14: 57–69.
50. Ediebah DE, Reijneveld JC, Taphoorn MJB, et al. Impact of neurocognitive deficits on patient–
proxy agreement regarding health-related quality of life in low-grade glioma patients. Qual Life
Res 2017; 26: 869–880.
51. Upton P, Lawford J and Eiser C. Parent–child agreement across child health-related quality of
life instruments: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 895–913.
52. Davison J, Maguire S, McLaughlin M, et al. Involving adolescents with intellectual disability
in the adaptation of self-reported subjective well-being measures: participatory research and
methodological considerations. J Intellect Disabil Res 2022; 66: 628–641.
53. Ingerski LM, Modi AC, Hood KK, et al. Health-related quality of life across pediatric chronic
conditions. J Pediatr 2010; 156: 639–644.
54. Kooijmans R, Mercera G, Langdon PE, et al. The adaptation of self-report measures to the
needs of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2022;
29: 250.
55. Bakkum L, Paalman C, Müller AR, et al. Accessibility and feasibility of experience sampling
methods for mental health research with people with intellectual disability: scoping of research
and stakeholder views. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2024; 37: e13190.
56. Kang S, Jones A, Shaffer RC, et al. Developing improved outcome measures in FXS: key
stakeholder feedback. Res Develop Disabil 2023; 137: 104502.
57. Adang LA, Gavazzi F, Jawad AF, et al. Development of a neurologic severity scale for Aicardi
Goutières Syndrome. Mol Genet Metab 2020; 130: 153–160.
58. Müller AR, Luijten MAJ, Haverman L, et al. Understanding the impact of tuberous sclerosis
complex: development and validation of the TSC-PROM. BMC Med 2023; 21: 298.
59. 60. Rode J. Rare diseases: understanding this public health priority. Paris: EURORDIS, 2005.
Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information
System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.
Med Care 2007; 45(Suppl. 1): S3–S11.
61. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information
system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome
item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1179–1194.
62. Nguyen TH, Han HR, Kim MT, et al. An introduction to item response theory for patient-
reported outcome measurement. Patient 2014; 7: 23–35.
63. Luijten MAJ, van Litsenburg RRL, Terwee CB, et al. Psychometric properties of the
PatientReported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric item
bank peer relationships in the Dutch general population. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2061–2070.
64. Fries JF, Witter J, Rose M, et al. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and
promis: assessment of physical function. J Rheumatol 2014; 41:153–158.
2
51