Page 47 - Zero for nine: Reducing alcohol use during pregnancy via health counselling and Internet-based computer-tailored feedback

Partner’s influences and other correlates of prenatal alcohol use
2
45
Table 2.4 Hierarchical logistic regression analyses assessing the relative influence of perceived and reported partner’s influence in addition to other factors of I-Change Model (N = 158)
1st step
Education
Lower Upper 3.30** 1.37 7.98 1.33* 1.06 1.66
Lower Upper 3.30** 1.37 7.98 1.33* 1.06 1.66
3.30 ** 1.33*
Lower Upper 1.37 7.98 1.06 1.66
2nd step
Education
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Drinking days per week before pregnancy
Perceived severity
0.46** 0.29 0.73 0.53* 0.29 0.96 3.42** 1.38 8.50 1.24 0.98 1.58
0.46** 0.29 0.73 0.53* 0.29 0.96 3.38** 1.38 8.32 1.30* 1.03 1.64
0.46** 0.53* 3.42** 1.24
0.29 0.73 0.29 0.96 1.38 8.50 0.98 1.58
Pros
Drinking days per week before pregnancy
Perceived severity Pros
0.53** 0.34 0.85 0.61 0.32 1.13 0.61* 0.42 0.90
0.49** 0.31 0.78 0.62 0.33 1.13 - - -
0.53** 0.61 0.61*
0.34 0.85 0.32 1.13 0.42 0.90
Perceived partner’s norm
Reported partner’s norm
- - -
0.43 0.17 1.12
Model 1 (including perceived partner’s influence)
Model 2 (including reported partner’s influence)
Model 3
(including both perceived and reported partner’s influence)
R2 = 0.42 OR 95%CI
R2 = 0.40 OR 95% CI
OR
R2 = 0.42 95% CI